Back

Rogelio, et al. all surnamed Pasino etc. Vs. Dr. Teofilo Eduardo F. Monterroyo etc.

ROGELIO, GEORGE, LOLITA, ROSALINDA, and JOSEPHINE, all surnamed PASI?O, represented by their father and attorney-in-fact JOSE PASI?O, Petitioners, DR. TEOFILO EDUARDO F. MONTERROYO, substituted by ROMUALDO MONTERROYO, MARIA TERESA MONTERROYO, and STEPHEN MONTERROYO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 159494 | 2008-07-31

D E C I S I O N


CARPIO, J.:

The Case

Before the Court is a petition for review[1] assailing the 31 January 2003 Decision[2] and the 5 August 2003 Resolution[3] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 63199. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Decision[4] dated 2 February 1999 of the Regional Trial Court of Iligan City, Branch 6 (trial court), in Civil Case No. 06-3060.

The Antecedent Facts

This case originated from an action for recovery of possession and damages, with prayer for the issuance of a temporary restraining order or writ of preliminary mandatory injunction, filed by Rogelio, George, Lolita, Rosalinda and Josephine, all...