Back

Nimfa Mitre Reyes, et al. Vs. Heirs of Eudosia D. Daez etc.

NIMFA MITRE REYES, BEATRIZ FELICIANO, DOLORES “Baby” ALVAREZ, BABY JAVIER, FERNANDO FRIAS, REMEDIOS MAYMIERO, ROMULO MARCA, SALVADOR NEBRES, VIVIAN SAZON and ERLINDA CORONADO, Petitioners, versus HEIRS OF EUDOSIA D. DAEZ, as represented by CECILIA D. DAEZ,[1] Attorney-in-Fact, Respondents.

G.R. No. 155553 | 2008-08-26

DECISION


AZCUNA, J.:

This petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court challenges the July 23, 2002 Decision[2] as well as the September 27, 2002 Resolution[3] of the Court of Appeals sustaining the September 28, 2001 Decision[4] of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 122, Caloocan City, which affirmed in toto the September 30, 1999 Decision[5] of the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch 49, Caloocan City, in Civil Case No. 23664 for Ejectment, ordering petitioners to vacate the leased premises.

On September 23, 1997, Cecilia D. Daez filed an Ejectment case against Nimfa Mitre Reyes, Pamela Tabon, Allen...