Back

Pedro Gabriel, et al. Vs. Murmura Y Jamias, et al.

PEDRO GABRIEL, FERNANDO JAMIAS, ALFREDO NIEDO, MABINI JAMIAS, BRAULIO TANGO, MARIANO ECHAVARI, ISIDRO RECITES, BERNARDO BAQUIRIN, FERMIN JAMIAS, FRANCISCO NIEDO, GAVINO JAMIAS, JULIANO ORBILLO, ROSENDO NIEDO, PACITA A. QUI?O, JESUS CACHO, REICARDO TAGANAS, BERNARDO PECIO, CELESTINO NIEDO, FRANCISCO TUBERA, JUAN NIEDO, CONSOLACIO DINGAL, SOFRONIO NIEDO, ROSALINDA JAMIAS & DOMINGO PARSASO, Petitioners, versus MURMURAY JAMIAS, INANAMA JAMIAS DE LARA, LIWAWA JAMIAS DE LOS REYES, LANGIT JAMIAS, DALISAY JAMIAS & ISAGANI JAMIAS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 156482 | 2008-09-17

D E C I S I O N


LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.:

In this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of

Court, petitioners seek the reversal and setting aside of the following issuances of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 73197, to wit:

1) Resolution dated October 18, 2002,[1] dismissing their petition for review of the decision dated September 12, 2002 of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (DARAB), Diliman, Quezon City;[2] and

2) Resolution dated December 17, 2002,[3] denying petitioners' motion for reconsideration.

The root of the controversy in this case is a large tract of rice land known as...