Back

Arturo O. Radaza, et al. Vs. The Hon. CA, et al.

ARTURO O. RADAZA, JULITO H. CUIZON, FERNANDO T. TAGA-AN, JR., and ROGELIO D. VELOSO, Petitioners, versus THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, SPECIAL NINETEENTH (19th) DIVISION, OMBUDSMAN MERCEDITAS GUTIERREZ, DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN VIRGINIA PALANCA-SANTIAGO, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (DILG), NORMA R. PATALINGJUG and CRISOLOGO SAAVEDRA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 177135 | 2008-10-15

D E C I S I O N


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:

Assailed in this Special Civil Action for Certiorari with a prayer for the Immediate Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Mandatory Injunction[1] is the Resolution[2] dated 2 April 2007 of the Special Nineteenth (19th) Division of the Court of Appeals in Cebu City in CA-G.R. SP No. 02615. Said Resolution denied petitioners' prayer for the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to enjoin the Office of the Ombudsman from implementing its Order[3] dated 29 March 2007 placing the petitioners herein under preventive suspension for a period of six months, pending...