Back

Eduardo Colmenares, et al. Vs. Heirs of Rosario Vda De Gonzales, et al.

EDUARDO COLMENARES and EPIFANIA COLMENARES,Petitioners,versus HEIRS OF ROSARIO VDA. DE GONZALES, NAMELY: HOMERO S. GONZALES, VIOLETA GALVEZ, FLORENCIA BELO, IMELDA CANCIO AND LETICIA DE PADUA; AND HEIRS OF HOMERO GONZALES, NAMELY: AIDA CRUZ GONZALES, DIANA GONZALES AND DANIEL GONZALES, Respondents.

G.R. No. 155454 | 2008-12-10

DECISION


NACHURA, J.:

Before us is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Resolutions[1] dated June 21, 2002 and September 3, 2002, respectively, of the Court of Appeals (CA) which denied due course to petitioner-spouses Eduardo and Epifania Colmenares' petition for certiorari.

The brief antecedents.

Rosario Vda. de Gonzales and Homero S. Gonzales (original plaintiffs in the Municipal Trial Court [MTC]), substituted by their respective sets of heirs, namely, respondents Homero Gonzales, Violeta Galvez, Florencia Belo, Imelda Cancio and Leticia de Padua for Rosario; and respondents Aida...