Back

Mariño, Jr. vs. Gamilla [DECISION]

EDUARDO J. MARIÑO, JR., MA. MELVYN P. ALAMIS, NORMA P. COLLANTES, and FERNANDO PEDROSA, Petitioners, versus GIL Y. GAMILLA, RENE LUIS TADLE, NORMA S. CALAGUAS, MA. LOURDES C. MEDINA, EDNA B. SANCHEZ, REMEDIOS GARCIA, MAFEL YSRAEL, ZAIDA GAMILLA, and AURORA DOMINGO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 149763 | 2009-07-07

D E C I S I O N
 
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
 
Assailed in this Petition for Review on Certiorari,[1] under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, are (1) the Decision[2] dated 16 March 2001 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 60657, dismissing petitioners' Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court; and (2) the Resolution[3] dated 30 August 2001 of the appellate court in the same case denying petitioners' Motion for Reconsideration.
 
I

FACTS

The Petition at bar arose from the following factual and procedural antecedents.

(1) Case No. NCR-OD-M-9412-022 

At the time when the numerous...