Back

Fidel O. Chua and Filiden Realty and Development Corporation Vs. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company, et al.

FIDEL O. CHUA and FILIDEN REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioners, versus METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY, ATTY. ROMUALDO CELESTRA, ATTY. ANTONIO V. VIRAY, ATTY. RAMON MIRANDA and ATTY. POMPEYO MAYNIGO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 182311 | 2009-08-19

D E C I S I O N


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:

This is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, assailing the Decision,[1] dated 31 January 2008, later upheld in a Resolution[2] dated 28 March 2008, both rendered by the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 88087. The Court of Appeals, in its assailed Decision, affirmed the Order[3] dated 3 July 2006 of Branch 258 of the Regional Trial Court of Parañaque City (RTC-Branch 258), dismissing the action for damages, docketed as Civil Case No. CV-05-0402, filed by petitioners Fidel O. Chua (Chua) and Filiden Realty and Development Corporation (Filiden), on the ground...