Back

Jesus Campos and Rosemarie Campos-Bautista Vs. Nenita Buevinida Pastrana, et al.

JESUS CAMPOS and ROSEMARIE CAMPOS-BAUTISTA, Petitioners, versus NENITA BUENVENIDA PASTRANA, ROGER BUENVENIDA, SONIA BUENVENIDA, TEDDY BUENVENIDA, VICTOR BUENVENIDA, HARRY BUENVENIDA, MILDRED BUENVENIDA, MANOLITO BUENVENIDA and DAISY BUENVENIDA, represented by their Attorney-in-Fact CARLITO BUENVENIDA,*** Respondents

G.R. No. 175994 | 2009-12-08

D E C I S I O N


DEL CASTILLO, J.:

It sometimes happens that a creditor, after securing a judgment against a debtor, finds that the debtor had transferred all his properties to another leaving nothing to satisfy the obligation to the creditor. In this petition for review on certiorari,[1] petitioners ask us to set aside the November 23, 2005 Decision[2] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 68731 declaring as null the sale of several parcels of land made by their parents in their favor, for being absolutely simulated transactions. Also assailed is the November 21, 2006 Resolution.[3]

Factual antecedents

This is the third case...