Back

Pentacapital Investment Corporation Vs. Makilito Mahinay / Pentacapital Investment Corporation Vs. Mikilito Mahinay

PENTACAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, versus MAKILITO B. MAHINAY, Respondent.

G.R. No. 171736 | 2010-07-05

DECISION


NACHURA, J.:

Before us are two consolidated petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner Pentacapital Investment Corporation. In G.R. No. 171736, petitioner assails the Court of Appeals (CA) Decision[1] dated December 20, 2005 and Resolution[2] dated March 1, 2006 in CA-G.R. SP No. 74851; while in G.R. No. 181482, it assails the CA Decision[3] dated October 4, 2007 and Resolution[4] dated January 21, 2008 in CA-G.R. CV No. 86939.

The Facts

Petitioner filed a complaint for a sum of money against respondent Makilito Mahinay based on two separate loans obtained by the latter,...