Back

Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp., rep. by Atty. Carlos R. Bautista, Jr. Vs. Rufino Aumentado, Jr.

PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENT AND GAMING CORPORATION (PAGCOR), represented by ATTY. CARLOS R. BAUTISTA, JR., Petitioner, versus RUFINO G. AUMENTADO, JR., Respondent.

G.R. No. 173634 | 2010-07-22

D E C I S I O N


CARPIO, J.:

The Case

This is a petition for review[1] of the 28 April 2006 Decision[2] and 19 July 2006 Resolution[3] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 83624. In its 28 April 2006 Decision, the Court of Appeals denied the petition for review filed by petitioner Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) of Civil Service Commission (CSC) Resolution No. 03-0082.[4] In its 19 July 2006 Resolution, the Court of Appeals denied PAGCOR's motion for reconsideration.

The Facts

Respondent Rufino G. Aumentado, Jr. (respondent) was employed by PAGCOR as a table supervisor. Subsequently, PAGCOR dismissed...