Back

PHIMCO Industries, Inc. Vs. PHIMCO Industries Labor Association (PILA), et al.

PHIMCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner, versus PHIMCO INDUSTRIES LABOR ASSOCIATION (PILA), and ERLINDA VAZQUEZ, RICARDO SACRISTAN, LEONIDA CATALAN, MAXIMO PEDRO, NATHANIELA DIMACULANGAN,* RODOLFO MOJICO, ROMEO CARAMANZA, REYNALDO GANITANO, ALBERTO BASCONCILLO,** and RAMON FALCIS, in their capacity as officers of PILA, and ANGELITA BALOSA,*** DANILO BANAAG, ABRAHAM CADAY, ALFONSO CLAUDIO, FRANCISCO DALISAY,**** ANGELITO DEJAN,***** PHILIP GARCES, NICANOR ILAGAN, FLORENCIO LIBONGCOGON,****** NEMESIO MAMONONG, TEOFILO MANALILI, ALFREDO PEARSON,******* MARIO PEREA,******** RENATO RAMOS, MARIANO ROSALES, PABLO SARMIENTO, RODOLFO TOLENTINO, FELIPE VILLAREAL, ARSENIO ZAMORA, DANILO BALTAZAR, ROGER CABER,********* REYNALDO CAMARIN, BERNARDO CUADRA,********** ANGELITO DE GUZMAN, GERARDO FELICIANO,*********** ALEX IBA?EZ, BENJAMIN JUAN, SR., RAMON MACAALAY, GONZALO MANALILI, RAUL MICIANO, HILARIO PE?A, TERESA PERMOCILLO,************ ERNESTO RIO, RODOLFO SANIDAD, RAFAEL STA. ANA, JULIAN TUGUIN and AMELIA ZAMORA, as members of PILA, Respondents

G.R. No. 170830 | 2010-08-11

D E C I S I O N


BRION, J.:

Before us is the petition for review on certiorari[1] filed by petitioner Phimco Industries, Inc. (PHIMCO), seeking to reverse and set aside the decision,[2] dated February 10, 2004, and the resolution,[3] dated December 12, 2005, of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 70336. The assailed CA decision dismissed PHIMCO's petition for certiorari that challenged the resolution, dated December 29, 1998, and the decision, dated February 20, 2002, of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC); the assailed CA resolution denied PHIMCO's subsequent motion for reconsideration.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The facts...