Back

La Campana Development Corporation Vs. Arturo Ledesma, et al.

LA CAMPANA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, versus ARTURO LEDESMA, HON. JUDGE ESTRELLA T. ESTRADA, in her capacity as PRESIDING JUDGE, Regional Trial Court, Branch 83, Quezon City, and the HON. COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents

G.R. No. 154152 | 2010-08-25

D E C I S I O N


PERALTA, J.:

This resolves the Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, praying that the Resolution[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA), dated February 13, 2002, ordering the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction, and its Resolution[2] dated June 28, 2002 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration, be declared null and void ab initio.

The antecedent facts are as follows.

Petitioner filed an ejectment case with the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) against private respondent Ledesma, alleging that despite expiration of the contract of lease executed between them and demands to vacate subject...