Back

E.G. & I. Construction Corporation and Edsel Galeos vs. ananais P. Sato, et al.

E.G & I. CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and EDSEL GALEOS, Petitioners, vs. ANANIAS P. SATO, NILO BERDIN, ROMEO M. LACIDA, JR., and HEIRS OF ANECITO S. PARANTAR, SR., namely: YVONNE, KIMBERLY MAE, MARYKRIS, ANECITO, JR., and JOHN BRYAN, all surnamed PARANTAR, Respondents.

G.R. No. 182070 | 2011-02-16



SECOND DIVISION
D E C I S I O N

NACHURA, J.:

Before the Court is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, assailing the Decision1 dated October 24, 2007 and the Resolution2 dated March 3, 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 02316.

The factual and procedural antecedents of the case are as follows:

Respondent Ananias P. Sato (Sato) was hired in October 1990 by petitioner E.G. & I. Construction Corporation as a grader operator, which is considered as technical labor. He held the position for more than thirteen (13) years. In April 2004, Sato discovered that petitioner corporation had not been...