Back

United Claimant Association of NEA (Unican) etc., et al. vs. National Electrification Administration (NEA), et al.

UNITED CLAIMANTS ASSOCIATION OF NEA (UNICAN), represented by its representative BIENVENIDO R. LEAL, in his official capacity as its President and in his own individual capacity, EDUARDO R. LACSON, ORENCIO F. VENIDA, JR., THELMA V. OGENA, BOBBY M. CARANTO, MARILOU B. DE JESUS, EDNA G. RANA, and ZENAIDA P. OLIQUINO, in their own capacities and in behalf of all those similarly situated officials and employees of the National Electrification Administration, </b> Petitioners, vs. NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION (NEA), NEA BOARD OF ADMINISTRATORS (NEA BOARD), ANGELO T. REYES as Chairman of the NEA Board of Administrators, EDITHA S. BUENO, Ex-Officio Member and NEA Administrator, and WILFRED L. BILLENA, JOSPEPH D. KHONGHUN, and FR. JOSE VICTOR E. LOBRIGO, Members, NEA Board, Respondents.

G.R. No. 187107 | 2012-01-31

EN BANC

D E C I S I O N

VELASCO, JR., J.:


The Case


This is an original action for Injunction to restrain and/or prevent the implementation of Resolution Nos. 46 and 59, dated July 10, 2003 and September 3, 2003, respectively, otherwise known as the National Electrification Administration (NEA) Termination Pay Plan, issued by respondent NEA Board of Administrators (NEA Board).


The Facts


Petitioners are former employees of NEA who were terminated from their employment with the implementation of the assailed resolutions.


Respondent NEA is a government-owned and/or controlled corporation created in accordance with Presidential Decree No. (PD) 269...