Back

Ricardo Rizal, et al. vs. Leoncia, et al., 666 SCRA 114

RICARDO RIZAL, POTENCIANA RIZAL, SATURNINA RIZAL, ELENA RIZAL, and BENJAMIN RIZAL, Petitioners,vs. LEONCIA NAREDO, ANASTACIO LIRIO, EDILBERTO CANTAVIEJA, GLORIA CANTAVIEJA, CELSO CANTAVIEJA, and the HEIRS of MELANIE CANTAVIEJA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 151898 | 2012-03-14

SECOND DIVISION


DECISION

 

REYES, J.:

 

Before this Court is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA) dated July 13, 2001 in CA-G.R. CV No. 26109, affirming the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 36, Calamba, Laguna which dismissed the Complaint,[2] docketed as Civil Case No. 1153-87-C[3] for “partition, recovery of shares with damages” of Lot No. 252 on res judicata.


Factual Antecedents

 

Herein petitioners Ricardo, Potenciana, Elena, Saturnina and Benjamin, all surnamed Rizal, commenced Civil Case No. 7836 against Matias Naredo (Matias), Valentin Naredo...