Back

In re: Supreme Court Resolution dated 28 April 2003 in G.R. Nos. 145817 and 145822

IN RE: SUPREME COURT RESOLUTION DATED 28 APRIL 2003 IN G.R. NOS. 145817 AND 145822

A.C. No. 6332 | 2012-04-17

EN BANC


D E C I S I O N

 

PER CURIAM:

 

 

Factual Background

This administrative case originated when respondent Atty. Magdaleno M. Peña filed an Urgent Motion to Inhibit and to Resolve Respondent’s Urgent Omnibus Motion dated 30 January 2003[1] (the subject Motion to Inhibit) in two consolidated petitions involving respondent that were pending before the Court.[2] This motion is directed against the then ponente of the consolidated petitions, Justice Antonio T. Carpio, and reads in part:

 

PRIVATE RESPONDENT MAGDALENO M. PEÑA, pro se, respectfully states:

 

...