Back

National Power Corporation Vs. Sps. Florimon V. Lleto, et al./Danilo Brillo, et al. Vs. National Power Corporation

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. SPS. FLORIMON V. ILETO and ROWENA NOLASCO, SPS. SERAFIN VALERO and TERESITA GONZALES, SPS. CORNELIO VALDERAMA and REMEDIOS CRUZ, SPS. ALEJANDRINO VALDERAMA and TEODORO STA. MARIA, RENATO VALDERAMA, all represented by SPS. CORNELIO VALDERAMA and REMEDIOS CRUZ; HEIRS OF APOLONIO DEL ROSARIO, represented by RICARDO DEL ROSARIO; DANILO BRILLO, WILFREDO BRILLO, REYNALDO BRILLO, THELMA BRILLO BORDADOR, and MA. VICTORIA BRILLO VILLARICO, represented by DANILO BRILLO; SPS. RUDY and MODESTA VELASCO; ROSEMARIE FUKUSUMI (vendee) / DANILO HERRERA (vendor); HEIRS OF SOFIA MANGAHAS VDA. DE SILVA, ROGELIO DE SILVA, APOLONIA DE SILVA GENER, and LUCIO DE SILVA, all represented by ROGELIO DE SILVA; and FRANCISCA MATEO-EUGENIO, Respondents. / DANILO BRILLO, WILFREDO BRILLO, LAURO BRILLO, REYNALDO BRILLO, THELMA BRILLO BORDADOR, the minor RIKKA OLGA VILLARICO, DEAN MARBIEN VILLARICO, herein represented by their legal guardian WILFREDO BRILLO, Petitioners, vs. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 169957 and G.R. No. 171558 | 2012-07-11

SECOND DIVISION

D E C I S I O N


BRION, J.:

          We resolve the consolidated petitions for review on certiorari assailing the decision1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 72723 dated September 30, 2005, as well as the appellate court's resolution2 dated February 14, 2006 denying the motions for reconsideration of Danilo Brillo, Wilfredo Brillo, Lauro Bril!o, Reynaldo Brillo, Thelma Brillo Bordador, Spouses Rudy Velasco and Modesta Velasco, and Spouses Serafin Valero and Teresita Valero. The assailed CA decision affirmed with modification the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 17,...