Back

Pilar Development Corporation Vs. Ramon Dumadag, Ronaldo Bacabac, et al.

PILAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, Vs. RAMON DUMADAG, RONALDO BACABAC, RONALDO NAVARRO, JIMMY PAGDALIAN, PAY DELOS SANTOS, ARMANDO TRILLOS, FELICISIMO TRILLOS, ARCANGEL FLORES, EDDIE MARTIN, PRESILLA LA YOG, CONRADO CAGUYONG, GINA GONZALES, ARLENE PEDROSA, JOCELYN ABELINO, ROQUE VILLARAZA, ROLANDO VILLARAZA, CAMILO GENOVE, NILDA ROAYANA, SUSAN ROAYANA, JUANCHO PANGANIBAN, BONG DE GUZMAN, ARNOLD ENVERSO, DONNA DELA RAZA, EMELYN HAGNA YA, FREDDIE DE LEON, RONILLO DE LEON, MARIO MARTINEZ, and PRECY LOPEZ, Respondents.

G.R. No. 194336 | 2013-03-11

 
 
THIRD DIVISION
 
DECISION 
 
PERALTA, J.: 
 
Challenged in this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Civil Procedure are the March 5, 2010 Decision1 and October 29, 2010 Resolution2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 90254, which affirmed the May 30, 2007 Decision3 of the Las Piñas Regional Trial Court, Branch 197 (trial court) dismissing the complaint filed by petitioner. 
 
On July 1, 2002, petitioner filed a Complaint4 for accion publicianawith damages against respondents for allegedly building their shanties, without its knowledge and consent, in its...