Back

Rodrigo E. Tapay and Anthony J. Rustia Vs. Attys. Charlie Bancolo and Janus Jarder

RODRIGO E. TAPA Y and ANTHONY J. RUSTIA, Complainants VS. ATTY. CHARLIE L. BANCOLO and ATTY. JANUS T. JARDER, Respondents.

A.C. No. 9604 | 2013-03-20

SECOND DIVISION

DECISION

CARPIO, J.: 

The Case 
This administrative case arose from a Complaint tiled by Rodrigo E. Tapay (Tapay) and Anthony J. Rustia (Rustia), both employees of the Sugar Regulatory Administration, against Atty. Charlie L. Ban colo (Atty. Bancolo) and Atty. Janus T. larder (A tty larder) for violation of the Canons of Ethics and Professionalism, Falsification of Public Document, Gross Dishonesty, and Harassment. 

The Facts

Sometime in October 2004, Tapay and Rustia received an Order dated 14 October 2004 from the Office of the Ombudsman-Visayas requiring them to file a...