Back

Manuel Catindig, represented by his legal representative Emiliano Cantidig-Rodrigo vs. Aurora Irene Vda. De Meneses / Silvino Roxas, Sr. represented by Felicisima Villafuerte Roxas vs. Court of Appeals, et al.

MANUEL CATINDIG, represented by his legal representative EMILIANO CATINDIG-RODRIGO, Petitioner, vs. AURORA IRENE VDA. DE MENESES, Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SILVINO ROXAS, SR., represented by FELICISIMA VILLAFUERTE ROXAS, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and AURORA IRENE VDA. DE MENESES Respondents.

G.R. No. 165851 / G.R. No. 168875 | 2011-02-02



SECOND DIVISION

D E C I S I O N


PERALTA, J.:

Before this Court are two consolidated cases, namely, (1) Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, docketed as G.R. No. 165851, filed by petitioner Manuel Catindig, represented by Emiliano Catindig-Rodrigo, assailing the Decision1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 65697, which affirmed the Decision of the Regional Trial Court of Malolos, Bulacan in Civil Case No. 320-M-95; and (2) Petition forCertiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, docketed as G.R. No. 168875, filed by petitioner Silvino Roxas, Sr., represented by...