Back

Republic vs. Pantranco North Express, Inc., et al.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the PRIVATIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OFFICE (PMO), Petitioner, versus PANTRANCO NORTH EXPRESS, INC. (PNEI), PANTRANCO EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PEA-PTGWO), EUSEBIO RAMOSO, CIRIACO M. MAGSINO, A. CACHUELA, A. CAMUS, M. CALAHI, R. CANO, B.T. LANTANO, L. BERSAMINA, A. ALFARO and 495 OTHERS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 178593 | 2012-02-15

FIRST DIVISION
 
RESOLUTION
 
VILLARAMA, JR., J.:
 
Before us is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, assailing the January 8, 2007[1] and June 26, 2007[2] Resolutions of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 97348.  The CA dismissed the petition for certiorari filed by petitioner Privatization and Management Office (PMO) to set aside the September 27, 2006 Resolution[3] of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).  The CA ruled that the petition was premature since petitioner did not seek reconsideration of the assailed NLRC resolution.
 
The...