Back

Nilda Verginesa-Suarez Vs. Judge Renato J. Dilag, et al./Office of the Court Administrator Vs. Judge Renato J. Dilag, et al.

A.M. No. RTJ-06-2014 NILDA VERGINESA-SUAREZ, Complainant, - versus - JUDGE RENATO J. DILAG and COURT STENOGRAPHER III CONCEPCION A. PASCUA, Respondents. x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x A.M. No. RTJ-11-2293 (formerly A.M. No. 06-07-415-RTC) OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, - versus - JUDGE RENATO J. DILAG, ESTER A. ASILO, Officer-in-Charge, Court Stenographer III, Regional Trial Court, Branch 73, Olongapo City, Zambales, and ATTY. RONALD D. GAVINO, Deputy Clerk of Court, Office of the Clerk of Court, Regional Trial Court, Olongapo City, Respondents.

A.M. No. RTJ-06-2014/A.M. No. RTJ-11-2293 | 2011-08-16

EN BANC

R E S O L U T I O N
 
PER CURIAM:
 
For our consideration are: (1) the Motion for Leave to Admit Attached Second Motion for Reconsideration[1] of our Decision[2] dated March 4, 2009 and the Resolution[3] dated April 28, 2009 in the consolidated cases A.M. Nos. RTJ-06-2014 and 06-07-415-RTC, filed by respondent Judge Renato J. Dilag (Judge Dilag), and (1) the Memorandum[4] dated October 21, 2008 submitted by the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) in A.M. No. 06-07-415-RTC. 
 
These pending incidents arose from the following factual background:
 
Acting upon the complaint of Court Stenographer III Nilda...