Back

Heirs of Francisco Bihag, namely: Alejandra Bihag, et al. Vs. Heirs of Nicasio Bathan, namely: Primitiva Bathan, et al.

HEIRS OF FRANCISCO BIHAG, NAMELY: ALEJANDRA BIHAG, NICOMEDES B. BIHAG, VERONICA B. ACOSTA, SUSANA B. MINOZA, PAULINO B. BIHAG, DANILO B. BIHAG, TIMOTEO B. BIHAG JR., EDILBERTO B. BIHAG, JOSEPHINE B. MINOZA, and MA. FEB. ARDITA, * Petitioners, vs. HEIRS OF NICASIO BATHAN, NAMELY: PRIMITIV AB. BATHAN and DUMININA B. GAMALIER,** Respondents,

G.R. No. 181949 | 2014-04-23

SECOND DIVISION

 

DECISION

 


DEL CASTILLO, J.:

 

The doctrine of finality of judgment dictates that, at the risk of occasional errors, judgments or orders must become final at some point in time. 1


This Petition for Review on CertiorarP under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the October 26, 20073 and January 14, 2008.4 Resolutions of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 03019.

 

Factual Antecedents


On April 23, 1992, petitioners heirs of Francisco Bihag (Francisco), namely: Teofilo T. Bihag, Jorge T. Bihag, Leona B. Velasquez, Vivencia B. Suson and Timoteo T. Bihag,5 represented by his heirs...