Back

Mateo Ramiro, Et Al. Vs. Clemencia Gra?o, Et Al. 054 Phil 744

MATEO RAMIRO, ET AL., plaintiffs. MATEO RAMIRO, appellant, vs. CLEMENCIA GRA?O, ET AL., defendants. ESTANISLAO REYES, appellee. ****************** ESTANISLAO REYES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. CLEMENCIA GRA?O and JOSE MARTINEZ, defendants-appellants. MARIANO CABANOS, intervenor-appellant.

G.R. No. 32296/G.R. No. 32331 | 1930-03-31

D E C I S I O N


ROMUALDEZ, J.:

On account of the intimate relationship between these two cases, the court below tried and adjudged them jointly, and they shall now also be dealt with in the same opinion.
They refer to four parcels of land situated in the barrio of San Lorenzo, municipality of San Pablo, Laguna.
One of these parcels is that marked as parcel A in case G. R. No. 32296, and as realty No. 2 in case G. R. No. 32331. This parcel is claimed by both by Mateo Ramiro and Juana Villanueva on the one side, and by Estanislao Reyes, on the other. It is also claimed by Jose Martinez, intervenor in case G. R. No. 32331.
The second...