Back

EMILIE SISON-BARIAS COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE MARINO E. RUBIA, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT [RTC], BRANCH 24, BIÑAN, LAGUNA AND EILEEN A. PECAÑA, DATA ENCODER II, RTC, OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT, BIÑAN, LAGUNA RESPONDENTS.

EMILIE SISON-BARIAS COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE MARINO E. RUBIA, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT [RTC], BRANCH 24, BIÑAN, LAGUNA AND EILEEN A. PECAÑA, DATA ENCODER II, RTC, OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT, BIÑAN, LAGUNA RESPONDENTS.

A.M. No. RTJ-14-2388 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 10-3554-RTJ] | 2014-06-10

EN BANC
 
D E C I S I O N

PER CURIAM:
 
Public trust requires that we exact strict integrity from judges and court employees. This case emphasizes the need for members of the judiciary and those within its employ to exhibit the impartiality, prudence, and propriety that the New Code of Judicial Conduct and the Code of Conduct for Court Personnel require when dealing with parties in pending cases.
 
Complainant Emilie Sison-Barias is involved in three cases pending before the sala of respondent Judge Marino Rubia.
 
The first case is an intestate proceeding.[1] Complainant filed a petition for letters of administration over the...