Back

Estanislaua Arenas vs. Fausto O. Raymundo 19 Phil 46

ESTANISLAUA ARENAS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. FAUSTO 0. RAYMUNDO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

G.R. No. L-5741 | 1911-03-13

D E C I S I O N
 
TORRES, J.:
 
This is an appeal filed by the defendant from a judgment of conviction rendered by the Hon. Judge Araullo.

On the  date of August 31, 1908, the attorneys for the plaintiffs, Estanislaua Arenas and Julian Lao, brought suit  against Fausto 0. Raymundo, alleging, as  a cause of action, that Estanislaua Arenas was the owner and proprietor of the jewelry described below with the respective value thereof:
 
Two gold tamborin rosaries, without bow or reliquary at P40 each.............................................
P80
One lady's comb for fastening the hair, made of...