Back

Dagan vs. Office of the Ombudsman

WILLIAM C. DAGAN, PETITIONER, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, REPRESENTED BY HON. ROGELIO A. RINGPIS, GRAFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OFFICER II, JAIME DILAG Y AGONCILLO, EDUARDO JOSE Y BAUTISTA, VERGEL CRUZ Y AQUINO,. EDUARDO DOMINGO Y COSCULLUELA, ROGELIO TANDIAMA Y ARESPACOCHAGA, REYNALDO FERNANDO Y GALANG, AND ROMEO BUENCAMINO Y FRANCISCO, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 184083 | 2013-11-19

EN BANC
 
D E C I S I O N

PEREZ, J.:

Assailed in this petition are the twin Resolutions of the Court of Appeals dated 28 April 20081 an 6 August 2008,2 respectively in CA G.R. SP No. 103150, dismissing petitioner William C. Dagan's appeal from the Decision and Order of the Office of the Ombudsman (OMB) in OMB-C-A-05-0263-F, exonerating respondents Jaime A. Dilag (Dilag), Eduardo B. Jose (Jose), Vergel A. Cruz, Eduardo C. Domingo, Rogelio A. Tandiama, Reynaldo G. Fernando and Romeo F. Buencamino from administrative charges.
 
The antecedent facts follow.
 
Petitioner is the owner of several racehorses that participated...