Back

EDITA S. BUENO AND MILAGROS E. QUINAJON, PETITIONERS, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, NAPOLEON S. RONQUILLO, JR., EDNA G. RAÑA AND ROMEO G. REFRUTO RESPONDENTS.

EDITA S. BUENO AND MILAGROS E. QUINAJON, PETITIONERS, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, NAPOLEON S. RONQUILLO, JR., EDNA G. RAÑA AND ROMEO G. REFRUTO RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 191712 | 2014-09-17

THIRD DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N

VILLARAMA, JR., J.:

Before the Court is a petition for review under Rule 45 seeking to reverse and set aside the Decision1 dated November 4, 2009 and Resolution2 dated March 18, 2010 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 105925.  The CA affirmed the Decisiondated January 22, 2007 of the Office of the Ombudsman (OMB) in OMB-C-A-05-0065-B finding the petitioners Edita S. Bueno (National Electrification Administration [NEA] Administrator) and Milagros E. Quinajon (Director of NEA’s Institutional Development Department) guilty of violation of Section 5 (a) of Republic Act...