Back

SEACREST MARITIME MANAGEMENT, INC., ROLANDO B. MAGCALE, AND SEALION SHIPPING LIMITED – UNITED KINGDOM, PETITIONERS, VS. MAURICIO G. PICAR, JR., RESPONDENT.

SEACREST MARITIME MANAGEMENT, INC., ROLANDO B. MAGCALE, AND SEALION SHIPPING LIMITED – UNITED KINGDOM, PETITIONERS, VS. MAURICIO G. PICAR, JR., RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 209383 | 2015-03-11

SECOND DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N
 
MENDOZA, J.:
 
This is a petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the May 2, 2013 Decision[1] and the September 9, 2013 Resolution[2] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 124763, which dismissed, for being moot and academic, the petition for certiorari filed under Rule 65 questioning the decision of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), in a case for disability benefits.
 
The Antecedents
 
Respondent Mauricio Picar, Jr. (Picar) was employed by petitioner Sealion Shipping Limited – United Kingdom through its local manning agent Seacrest...