Back

PEDRO ANGELES, REPRESENTED BY ADELINA T. ANGELES, ATTORNEY-IN FACT, PETITIONER, VS. ESTELITA B. PASCUAL, MARIA THERESA PASCUAL, NERISSA PASCUAL, IMELDA PASCUAL, MA. LAARNI PASCUAL AND EDWIN PASCUAL, RESPONDENTS.

PEDRO ANGELES, REPRESENTED BY ADELINA T. ANGELES, ATTORNEY-IN FACT, PETITIONER, VS. ESTELITA B. PASCUAL, MARIA THERESA PASCUAL, NERISSA PASCUAL, IMELDA PASCUAL, MA. LAARNI PASCUAL AND EDWIN PASCUAL, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 157150 | 2011-09-21

FIRST DIVISION
 
R E S O L U T I O N

BERSAMIN, J.:

Under appeal is the decision promulgated on January 31, 2002 in CA- G.R. CV No. 61600,[1] which involved a dispute about the true location of the respective lots of the parties, with the respondents claiming that the petitioner had encroached on their lot but the latter denying the encroachment.

Antecedents
 
Neighbors Regidor Pascual (Pascual) and Pedro Angeles (Angeles) were registered owners of adjacent parcels of land located in Cabanatuan City.  Pascual owned Lot 4, Block 2 (Lot 4) of the consolidation-subdivision plan (LRC) Psd-951, a portion of the consolidation of Lots...