Back

AUTO PROMINENCE CORPORATION AND PROTON PILIPINAS CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, VS. PROF. DR. MARTIN WINTERKORN, DR. HORST NEUMANN, DR. ANDREAS SCHLEEF, ERICH SCHMITT, RUPERT STADLER, DR. JOCHEM HEIZMANN, AND RALPH WEYLER, RESPONDENTS.

AUTO PROMINENCE CORPORATION AND PROTON PILIPINAS CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, VS. PROF. DR. MARTIN WINTERKORN, DR. HORST NEUMANN, DR. ANDREAS SCHLEEF, ERICH SCHMITT, RUPERT STADLER, DR. JOCHEM HEIZMANN, AND RALPH WEYLER, RESPONDENTS.

G. R. No. 178104 | 2009-01-27

THIRD DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N
 
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
 
In this Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court, petitioners Proton Pilipinas Corporation (PPC) and Auto Prominence Corporation (APC) seek the reversal of the 27 September 2006Decision[2] and 30 May 2007 Resolution,[3] both of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 93107 entitled, Auto Prominence Corp., et al. v. Hon. Raul Gonzales, in his official capacity as Secretary of Justice, et al.  In the assailed decision, the Court of Appeals dismissed the Petition for Certiorari of petitioners PPC...