Back

Aldovino etc. vs. Secretary Alunan III [DECISION]

VIOLETA ALDOVINO, ALI ALIBASA, FELIX BALINO, DIONISIO BALLESTEROS, JOSE N. BALEIN, JR., FREDDIE CAUTON, JANE CORROS, ROBERTO CRUZ, TRINIDAD DACUMOS, ANGELITA DIMAPILIS, ANDREA ESTONILO, EFREN FONTANILLA, MARY PAZ FRIGILLANA, MANUEL HENSON, SAMUEL HIPOL, MERLENE IBALIO, MAGDALENA JAMILLA, ALEXANDER JUSTINIANI, ROMULO MIRADOR, JULIO MIRAVITE, DANTE NAGTALON, CLARITA NAMUCO, ALICIA ORBITA, ANGELITA PUCAN, MYRNA P. SALVADOR, LIBRADA TANTAY, AND ARACELI J. DE VEYRA, PETITIONERS, VS. SECRETARY RAFAEL ALUNAN III, DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM, AND SECRETARY GUILLERMO M. CARAGUE, DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT, RESPONDENTS. JOSEPHINE G. ANDAYA, ROSALINDA T. ATIENZA, JOSE M. BALDOVINO, JR., ASUNCION C. BRIONES, RIZALINA P. ESPIRITU, MARIBELLE A. GARCIA, ABDULIA T. LANDINGIN, FLORITA O. OCAMPO, ROLANDO SISON, LOURDES B. TAMAYO, AND ROLANDO VALDEZ, INTERVENORS. ERLINDA PIZA, ELEONOR SAGNIT, FIDEL SEVIDAL, CONCEPCION TIMARIO, ELOISA ALONZO, ANGELITO DELA CRUZ, ROLANDO C. CAGASCA, LYNIE ARCENAS, MARIA EMMA JASMIN, ALFONSO ANGELES, MACACUNA PANGANDAMAN, ROSALIA MAUNA, ROMEO PADILLA, ASCENSION PADILLA, CRISPULO PADILLA, VIRGILIO DEJERO, MEDARDO ILAO, ROSITA SOMERA, ARMANDO CRUZ, CATALINO DABU, FRANCISCO VILLARAIZ, NORMA JUMILLA, KENNEDY BASA, AND ARMANDO MENDOZA, INTERVENORS. ANICITA S. BALUYUT, ANTONINO D. EDRALIN, EVELYN A. ENRIQUEZ, MA. VICTORIA L. JACOBO, DANIEL M. MANAMTAM, JESSIE C. MANRIQUE, ENCARNACION T. RADAZA AND MARIO P. RUIVIVAR, INTERVENORS. AMOR T. MEDINA AND FELIX L. POLIQUIT, INTERVENORS.

G.R. No. 102232 | 1994-03-09

D E C I S I O N
 
BELLOSILLO, J.:
 
ASSERTING that their plight is similar to petitioners' in Mandani v. Gonzales,[1] and in the consolidated cases of Abrogar v. Garrucho, Jr., and Arnaldo v. Garrucho, Jr.,[2]herein petitioners and intervenors seek reinstatement and payment of back wages.
 
Section 29 of Executive Order No. 120, which took effect upon its approval on 30 January 1987, reorganizing the then Ministry of Tourism, provides that incumbents whose positions are not included in the new position structure and staffing pattern or who are not reappointed are deemed separated from the service....