Back

Doehle-Phil Manning Agency Inc etc. vs. Haro

DOEHLE-PHILMAN[1] MANNING AGENCY INC., DOHLE (IOM) LIMITED AND CAPT. MANOLO T. GACUTAN, PETITIONERS, VS. HENRY C. HARO, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 206522 | 2016-04-18

D E C I S I O N
 
DEL CASTILLO, J.:
 
"[T]he constitutional policy to provide full protection to labor is not meant to be a sword to oppress employers. The commitment of this Court to the cause of labor does not prevent us from sustaining the employer when it is in the right. We should always be mindful that justice is in every case for the deserving, to be dispensed with in the light of established facts, the applicable law, and existing jurisprudence."[2]

This Petition for Review on Certiorari assails the July 20, 2012 Decision[3] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-GR. SP No. 117988. The CA reversed and set...