Back

Phil-Nippon Kyoei Corp. vs. Gudelosao etc.

PHIL-NIPPON KYOEI, CORP., PETITIONER, VS. ROSALIA T. GUDELOSAO, ON HER BEHALF AND IN BEHALF OF MINOR CHILDREN CHRISTY MAE T. GUDELOSAO AND ROSE ELDEN T. GUDELOSAO, CARMEN TANCONTIAN, ON HER BEHALF AND IN BEHALF OF THE CHILDREN CAMELA B. TANCONTIAN, BEVERLY B. TANCONTIAN, AND ACE B. TANCONTIAN, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 181375 | 2016-07-13

D E C I S I O N
 
JARDELEZA, J.:
 
This is a petition for review on certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court filed by Phil-Nippon Kyoei, Corp. (Petitioner) from the Decision[2] of the Court of Appeals (CA) dated October 4, 2007 (CA Decision) and its Resolution[3] dated January 11, 2008 in CA-G.R. SP No. 95456. The CA reinstated the Labor Arbiter's Decision[4]dated August 5, 2004 (LA Decision) with the modification, among others, that petitioner is liable to respondents under the insurance cover it procured from South Sea Surety & Insurance Co., Inc. (SSSICI). The CA ruled that...