Back

Quilo vs. Bajao

EDGARDO A. QUILO AND ADNALOY VILLAHERMOSA, PETITIONERS, VS. TEODULA BAJAO, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 186199 | 2016-09-07

D E C I S I O N
 
PEREZ, J.:
 
Before us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure assailing the Order[2] of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Branch 17, Manila, dated 18 December 2008, which denied the petition for certiorari filed under Rule 65 due to failure to attach with the petition a certified true copy of the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) Decision[3] and Orders[4] in violation of Section 1, Rule 65 and for disregarding the three (3)-day notice rule under Section 4, Rule 15.

The facts as culled from the records are as follows:

The present case stemmed...