Back

Navarro vs. Office of the Ombudsman

ATTY. AMADO Q. NAVARRO, PETITIONER, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE-REVENUE INTEGRITY PROTECTION SERVICES (DOF-RIPS), REPRESENTED BY JOSE APOLONIO, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 210128 | 2016-08-17

D E C I S I O N
 
MENDOZA, J.:
 
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the April 24, 2013 Decision[1] and the November 8, 2013 Resolution[2] of the Court of Appeals (CA), in CA-G.R. SP No. 124353, which affirmed the September 8, 2009 Decision[3] and the May 31, 2011 Order[4] of the Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman), in OMB-C-A-05-0260-F.

The questioned issuances of the Ombudsman found petitioner Atty. Amado Q. Navarro (Navarro) guilty of the administrative offenses of Dishonesty, Grave Misconduct and Violation of Republic Act (R.A.) No....