Back

Office of the Ombudsman vs. P/Supt. Brillantes et al.

THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. P/SUPT. ROGER JAMES BRILLANTES, PO3 PETER PAUL PABLICO, AND PO1[1] NOEL FABIA, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 215008] THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. POLICE SENIOR INSPECTOR[2] DANTE G. YANG, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 213699 |

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Manila
 
THIRD DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N
 
PERALTA, J.:
 
Before the Court are two consolidated petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.

In G.R. No. 213699, petitioner assails the Decision[3] and Resolution[4] of the Court of Appeals (CA), dated January 14, 2014 and July 21, 2014, respectively, in CA-G.R. SP No. 127487. The assailed CA Decision nullified and set aside the Decision dated January 20, 2012, as well as the Order dated May 16, 2012 of the Ombudsman, which dismissed respondents Brillantes, Pablico and Fabia from the Philippine...