Back

PNB vs. Heirs of late Entapa et al.

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER, VS. HEIRS OF THE LATE IRENEO AND CARIDAD ENTAPA, NAMELY: ROSARIO ENTAPA-ORPEZA, JULIANNE E. HAMM,[1] CERINA G. ENTAPA, WINSTON G. ENTAPA (DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HIS SPOUSE, NINFA LAMISTOZA-ENTAPA, FRANKLIN G. ENTAPA, MARINA E. SCHACHT, AND ELVIRA G. ENTAPA, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 215072 | 2016-09-07

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Manila
 
SECOND DIVISION
 
DECISION
 
LEONEN, J.:
 
The Constitution requires that a court must state the factual and legal grounds on which its decisions are based. Any decision that fails to adhere to this mandate is void.

The Philippine National Bank, through a Petition for Review on Certiorari,[2] assails the Decision[3] dated June 4, 2013 and Resolution[4] dated October 2, 2014 of the Court of Appeals, which nullified the Decision[5] of Branch 54 of the Regional Trial Court of Bacolod City. The Court of Appeals nullified the Regional Trial Court Decision for...