Back

Castro vs. Mendoza

TEDDY CASTRO AND LAURO SEBASTIAN, Petitioners versus PABLITO V. MENDOZA, SR., on his behalf and as attorney-in-fact of RICARDO C. SANTOS, ARLENE C. MENDOZA, MARGIE AC DE LEON, NANCY S. REYES, MARITA PAGLINAWAN, NATIVIDAD C. MUNDA, MARILOU DE GUZMAN RAMOS, LEONCIA PRINCIPIO, CECILIA DINIO, ANGEL DELA CRUZ, ZENAIDA SANTOS, LOURDES S. LUZ, MARIFE F. CRUZ, ANTONIO H. SANTOS, CONSTANCIA SANTOS, MARCELINA SP. DAMEG, PLACIDO DE LEON, LILIAN SANTOS, (collectively organized as Bustos Public Market II Vendors and Stall Owners Association) and MUNICIPALITY OF BUSTOS, BULACAN, Respondents PRESENT: VELASCO, JR, J, CHAIRPERSON; BERSAMIN; REYES; JARDELEZA AND TIJAM, JJ

G.R. No. 212778 | 2017-04-26

Repulic of the Philippines
Supreme Court, Baguio
THIRD DIVISION
 
DECISION
 
JARDELEZA, J:
 
This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Decision1of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 108859. The CA reversed and set aside issuances of the Provincial Agrarian Reform Adjudicator (PARAD) in connection with the execution of its Decision in Reg. Case No. 739-Bulacan ‘94.2 The PARAD held that petitioners Teddy Castro and Lauro C. Sebastian (petitioners) are entitled to redeem the property subject of this case.
 
The PARAD had issued orders to effect the...