Back

Mendoza vs. Peroxide

PABLO AND PABLINA MARCELO-MENDOZA, PETITIONERS, VS. PEROXIDE PHILS., INC., HEREIN REPRESENTED BY ROBERT R. NAVERA, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 203492 | 2017-04-24

DECISION
 
REYES, J.:
 
Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court are the Decision[2] dated May 21, 2012 and Resolution[3] dated September 12, 2012 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No.  122366, which revoked and vacated the Omnibus Order[4] dated June 22, 2011 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City, Branch 220, in Civil Case No. Q-95-24760.
 
The Facts

This case stemmed from an ejectment case filed by Pablo Marcelo (Pablo) and Pablina Marcelo-Mendoza (collectively, the petitioners) against respondent Peroxide Phils., Inc. (PPI), docketed as Civil Case No. 3916...