Back

Hoegh Fleet Services Phils. Inc. vs. Turallo

HOEGH FLEET SERVICES PHILS., INC., AND/OR HOEGH FLEET SERVICES AS, PETITIONERS, VS. BERNARDO M. TURALLO, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 230500] BERNARDO M. TURALLO, PETITIONER, VS. HOEGH FLEET SERVICES PHILS., INC., AND/OR HOEGH FLEET SERVICES AS, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 230481 | 2017-07-26

RESOLUTION
 
VELASCO JR., J.:
 
These are consolidated Petitions for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, which seek to reverse and set aside the Decision[1] dated November 8, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) and its Resolution[2] dated March 8, 2017 in CA-G.R. SP No. 142979. There, Hoegh Fleet Services Phils., Inc. and/or Hoegh Fleet Services AS (hereinafter referred to as Hoegh Fleet) was ordered to pay Turallo US$90,000.00, US$3,084.54 and US$1,000.00 as disability compensation, sickness allowance and attorney's fees, respectively.[3]

The facts, as found by the CA, are as follows:

On 9 November...