Back

In re guardianship of the incompetent De Inchausti vs. J.R. De Inchausti [Separate Opinions, ARAULLO, J.]

In re guardianship of the incompetent Jose R. de Inchausti. CONSUELO RICO VDA. DE INCHAUSTI, petitioner-appellee, vs. J. R. DE INCHAUSTI, opponent-appellant.

G.R. No. L-14383 | 1919-11-29

Separate Opinions
 
ARAULLO, J., dissenting:
 
We do not agree to the foregoing decision, affirming the order of May 9, 1918, of the Court of First Instance of the city of Manila, whereby the motion of the attorney of the opponent, Jose R. de Inchausti, that all the proceedings had in this case be annulled, was dismissed.
 
The basis of said motion was that the Court of First Instance had no jurisdiction over the person of Jose R. de Inchausti, and that the property of the latter could not fully be considered in custodiae legis. Appellant's principal assignment of error in his brief, with reference to this...