Back

Ornales vs. Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon

GERALDINE C. ORNALES, ROSENDO R. EGUIA, VINCENT U. VERGARA, RODOLFO A. DE CASTRO, JR., AND RAMIRO V. MAGNAYE, PETITIONERS, VS. OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR LUZON, ROBERTO RICALDE, MODESTO DE LEON, ALICIA MANGUBAT, AND LENELITA BALBOA, PROMULGATED: RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 214312 | 2018-09-05

DECISION
 
LEONEN, J.:
 
Orders and decisions of the Office of the Ombudsman in criminal cases may be elevated to this Court via a Rule 65 petition, while its orders and decisions in administrative disciplinary cases may be appealed to the Court of Appeals via a Rule 43 petition.

This resolves the Petition for Review[1] filed by Geraldine C. Ornales (Ornales), Rosendo R. Eguia (Eguia),[2] Vincent U. Vergara (Vergara), Rodolfo A. De Castro, Jr. (De Castro), and Ramiro V. Magnaye (Magnaye ) assailing the Court of Appeals April 15, 2014[3] and September 8, 2014[4] Resolutions in CA-G.R. SP No. 133085, which dismissed...