Back

Villanueva vs. Reodique

LOIDA S. VILLANUEVA, PETITIONER, VS. F/SINSP. ROLANDO T. REODIQUE, RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 222003] OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. F/SINSP. ROLANDO T. REODIQUE, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 221647 | 2018-11-27

D E C I S I O N
 
PER CURIAM:
 
These are consolidated petitions under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Decision[1] dated 29 April 2015 and the Resolution[2] dated 24 November 2015 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 136506 which affirmed with modification the Decision[3] dated 23 August 2012 and the Joint Order[4] dated 5 December 2013 of the Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman) finding respondent F/SInsp. Rolando T. Reodique (respondent) guilty of conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service. Both Loida S. Villanueva (Villanueva) and the Ombudsman question the Court of Appeals'...