Back

Pacio vs. DOHLE-PHILMAN Manning Agency, Inc.

DANILO L. PACIO, PETITIONER, V. DOHLE-PHILMAN MANNING AGENCY, INC., DOHLE (IOM) LIMITED, AND/OR MANOLO T. GACUTAN, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 225847 | 2019-07-03

D E C I S I O N
 
A. REYES, JR., J.:
 
Challenged before this Court via this Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court is the Decision[2] dated January 22, 2016 of the Court of Appeals, and its Resolution[3] dated July 10, 2016, in CA-G.R. SP No. 138514, which reversed the Decision[4] dated September 30, 2014 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC LAC NO. 07-000557-14-OFW.
 
The Antecedent Facts
 
The facts are as follows:
 
On July 4, 2012, respondent Dohle-Philman Manning Agency, for and in behalf of its principal, Dohle (IOM) Limited...