Back

Eleazar, et al. vs. Office of Ombudsman etc.

ELOISA M. ELEAZAR AND VIRGELIO M. ELEAZAR, PETITIONERS, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PSI LODOVICO M. ELEAZAR, JR., PO2 JOMAR B. CAMAT, PO2 BILLY JOE M. COLLADO, PO3 ERWIN E. LOPEZ, BRGY. CAPTAIN EDGAR M. ELEAZAR, AND BRGY. KAGAWAD ROGELIO E. LOPEZ, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 224399 | 2020-08-24

SECOND DIVISION
 
 
D E C I S I O N
 
INTING, J.:
 
This Petition[1] for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the Decision[2] dated May 28, 2015 and the Resolution[3] dated March 29, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 131985 which dismissed petitioners' petition for certiorari for lack of jurisdiction.
 
The Antecedents
 
Eloisa M. Eleazar[4] filed an administrative complaint[5] for Grave Misconduct before the Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman) against: Police Senior Inspector Lodovico M. Eleazar, Jr. (PSI Lodovico), Police...