Back

Oliveros vs. Office of the Ombudsman

DANILO OLIVEROS Y IBAÑEZ, PETITIONER, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, DANTE M. QUINDOZA, DIONISIO SAMEN, ERNIE LAZO, SIXTO INALES, OSCAR IGNA, ED HERNANDEZ, VICTORIO SUNGA, RONALD SALVACION, ANGEL PINEDA, DONATO AMADO, ROMEO GALURAN, AND ELMER AVANZADO, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 210597 | 2020-09-28

THIRD DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N
 
LEONEN, J.:
 
The Office of the Ombudsman's finding on the absence of probable cause to file an information shall be binding, unless it is convincingly shown that this determination was tainted with grave abuse of discretion.
 
This Court resolves the Petition for Certiorari[1] filed by Danilo Oliveros y Ibañez (Oliveros), who assails the Office of Ombudsman's September 12, 2011[2] and October 8, 2013[3] Orders dismissing his complaint for violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.
 
On March 12,...