Back

Akiapat vs. Summit Bank

LOURDES C. AKIAPAT, BILLY CACHERO AND NOEL CACHERO, PETITIONERS, VS. SUMMIT BANK (RURAL BANK OF TUBLAY [BENGUET], INC.), RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 222776, June 28, 2021] RICHARD CACHERO, JEANETTE C. GAMBOA AND TERESITA C. MAINEM, PETITIONERS, VS. SUMMIT BANK (RURAL BANK OF TUBLAY [BENGUET], INC.), RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 222505 | 2021-06-28

THIRD DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N
 
INTING, J.:
 
For consideration are two consolidated Petitions[1] for R view on Certiorari assailing the Decision[2] dated February 27, 2015 and the Resolution[3] dated January 8, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 125707. The CA found grave abuse of discretion on the part of Branch 63, Regional Trial Court (RTC), La Trinidad, Benguet which directed Summit Bank [Rural Bank of Tublay [Benguet], Inc.] (Summit Bank) to reapply for an extrajudicial foreclosure of the real estate mortgage and exclude the pro indiviso shares of the third-party...