Back

Rapid City Realty and Development Corp vs. Paez-Cline [RESOLUTION]

RAPID CITY REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. LOURDES ESTUDILLO PAEZ­-CLINE ALIAS LOURDES PAEZ-­VILLA, ORLANDO VILLA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, REGISTER OF DEEDS OF ANTIPOLO, AND OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 217148 | 2021-12-07

RESOLUTION
 
CAGUIOA, J:
 
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] (Petition) under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court (Rules) assailing the Decision[2] dated July 1, 2014 (Decision) and Resolution[3] dated February 23, 2015 (Resolution) of the Court of Appeals[4] (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 96330, which granted the appeals of respondents spouses Lourdes Paez-Cline also known as Lourdes Paez-Villa (Lourdes) and Orlando Villa (collectively Spouses Villa) and respondents Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) and Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), reversed and set aside the Decision[5]...