Back

Servflex, Inc. vs. Urera

SERVFLEX, INC., PETITIONER, VS. LOVELYNN* M. URERA, SHERRYL I. CABRERA, PRECIOUS** C. PALANCA AND JOCO JIM L. SEVILLA, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 246369 | 2022-03-29

D E C I S I O N
 
INTING, J.:
 
Assailed in the Petition for Review[1] on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court is the Decision[2] dated July 5, 2018 and the Resolution[3] dated April 1, 2019 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA­-G.R. SP No. 148586. The CA granted the petition for certiorari before it and denied the motions for reconsideration separately filed by the respondents therein.
 
The Antecedents

The case stemmed from a complaint for regularization of employment and nonpayment of benefits with prayer for moral and exemplary damages and attorney's fees filed by Lovelynn M....